| 首页| 哈尔的移动城堡| 妖女迷行| 杀人回忆| 中国最强音| 勇者行动| 帝都| 溏心风暴|
您的位置:首页 > 新闻中心 > 社会 > 正文

qq邮箱

China Q&A | Green thinking, new pathways: how China's ancient wisdom is scaling up Nature-based Solutions_我的网站

中国好歌曲

一 |          By Lin Zhuowei    (ECNS) -- The cicadas were deafening in Haizhu National Wetland Park on a sweltering summer morning. An electric buggy carrying a delegation of Chinese and international experts wound its way through unbroken groves of lychee and longan trees. Were it not for the distant silhouette of the Canton Tower, one could easily forget that this lush expanse sat squarely in the heart of a megacity of close to 20 million people.    "Wait, please stop the car." Stewart Maginnis, deputy director general of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), leaned forward abruptly and asked the driver to pull over.    He pulled out his phone and aimed his lens at the lake, where the gleaming Canton Tower rose beyond a sweep of almost unbroken green, perfectly embedded in the city's skyline.    "I took that picture because I want to be able to show when I make presentations of how you can have a very rich, very vibrant, very biodiverse area well managed in the city for the benefit of people and nature," Maginnis later explained in an exclusive interview with China News Network. For him, that seamless marriage of urban landscape and natural beauty was both a living embodiment of China's ancient philosophy of "harmony between humanity and nature" and a reflection of the core idea behind Nature-based Solutions, or NbS.    That unscheduled stop opened the door to a far-reaching conversation about China's ecological transformation and its place in global environmental governance.    Green thinking: a real shift in leadership    "If you look back in the 20th century, a lot of the conservation thinking and leadership was more Western," Maginnis said, seated in the shade of a tree.    "I'm convinced that we're seeing a real shift to global leadership coming from this region, and particularly from China." The shift, in the eyes of Maginnis, one of the architects of the global NbS concept, transcends money or measurable environmental improvements. More important is that "China is bringing in really much-needed new conceptual framings for how we will undertake conservation on a planet with nearly 10 billion people."    The heart of that framing, he said, can be boiled down to a single word: coexistence.    "And specifically, I would actually say the whole concept of coexistence — that we don't separate one area here and then we can do whatever we want elsewhere, that we need to see nature conservation as a whole-of-society, a whole-of-planet approach."    Luo Ming, a research fellow at the Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center of China's Ministry of Natural Resources, sees that same logic running deep in China's own traditions.    "We have long embraced the philosophy of 'harmony between humanity and nature'," Luo said. "Stewart has been promoting 'coexistence' everywhere he goes, and that is exactly what this ancient idea means."    For Luo, this is no abstract concept. She pointed to the Dujiangyan Irrigation System, built more than two millennia ago and still functioning today. It uses a fish-mouth-shaped weir to split the flow of Minjiang River, the Feishayan floodgate to separate sediment, and the Baopingkou diversion passage to irrigate the Chengdu Plain.    "Of course, we cannot define Dujiangyan as an NbS project outright, because NbS is a modern concept. Nevertheless, its approach of leveraging natural processes to meet human needs is consistent with the core spirit of NbS." In China, she said, "we have this NbS gene."    A test bed at scale: from pilot projects to mainstream action    Maginnis rattled off the numbers of China's ecological restoration with the ease of someone who has been studying them for years. "If you look at the improvement in water quality, I think it's only in 10 to 15 years that we have seen an improvement of Grades Ⅰ to Ⅲ water from about 70 percent to well over 90 percent. And Grade Ⅴ has been reduced to almost nothing."    He also noted that China now has 28 sites certified under the IUCN Green List — "the country with the most green listed sites in the world at the minute."    What excites him most, however, is that China is moving beyond the perennial trap of pilot projects that never scale up. He described the country as "the engine room of developing and applying Nature-based Solutions."    "There is definitely a lot of interest in Nature-based Solutions, but people tend to be saying, 'We want to pilot-test Nature-based Solutions.' My response, in that case, is: 'Well, go to China. Nature-based Solutions are already being scaled up in China.'"    Why China? Luo offered a systematic explanation.    Beneath the NbS successes, she said, lies a profound intellectual evolution: from the ancient ideal of harmony to the modern vision of a "community of life" — mountains, rivers, forests, farmlands, lakes, grasslands, and deserts are all parts of a community of life. "Those who plant trees cannot focus merely on afforestation; those managing water cannot focus merely on water governance; those protecting farmland cannot focus merely on farmland conservation. This 'community of life' philosophy shifts our mindset from isolated, fragmented restoration towards holistic, systematic thinking. This is also the essence of NbS."    That philosophy has been locked in place by hard institutions.    The "Two Mountains" theory — "lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets" — brings ecosystem services into the heart of development planning. It is backed by the world's largest ecological protection compensation program, channeling more than 200 billion yuan (about US$29.5 billion) a year from central funds.    Ecological red lines, permanent basic farmland boundaries and a unified national spatial planning map have turned NbS projects into something "verifiable, measurable and auditable" in China.    Luo noted that this approach meets the three prerequisites for NbS that the global community widely agrees on: high-level political commitment, collective coordinated action, and scaling up and mainstreaming.    A sanctuary in the city: what Haizhu reveals    The most persuasive evidence came from the very ground beneath their feet. Haizhu Wetland was once a flood-prone expanse of fruit orchards, a "10,000-mu orchard" that has been transformed into an ecological lung for the city. Park staff describe it with a local motto: "Step inside, and you are in nature; step outside, and you are in prosperity." Four metro lines reach the surrounding area, stitching the wetland into the fabric of daily life.     "In a different place in the world under less visionary leadership, Haizhu might have been converted to a prime development site, and it could have been converted to buildings and whatnot," Maginnis remarked. Instead, Guangzhou chose to protect the green space and then enhance it, removing invasive species and restoring habitats to create an intensely vibrant ecosystem.    It was Luo's first visit to Haizhu, but she read its landscape immediately. "Look at its ridges and furrows, the drainage and irrigation system; that's traditional wisdom." She observed that by preserving natural spaces and restoring natural processes, the wetland tackles multiple challenges at once. "When a rainstorm comes, it serves as a retention area. Its wetland area is large, so it can cope with extreme weather and climate change, and the biodiversity is very rich."    For her, this is the essence of NbS. "Nature-based Solutions are not about solving a single problem. In traditional flood control, we might channelize and harden a riverbed so that the water can flow away quickly. But the NbS approach is to restore the hydrological process, improve connectivity, slow the water down, and create more space for retention, so that it doesn’t cause disaster."    At the same time, she added, "the wetlands and green belts along both banks serve as buffer zones, providing purification, biodiversity, and places for people to rest and enjoy themselves. It can deliver multiple ecosystem services, not just a single service."    What struck Maginnis equally was the cultural dimension. Traditional farming practices are kept alive here as a living repository of local culture. More than 500,000 schoolchildren arrive each year by metro to plant rice and learn to become "green citizens." The wetland has even yielded three species never recorded before.    "This place is protected by law," a staff member explained. "Nobody has the right to demolish it. It can endure for generations and become a treasured part of their childhood memories."        For Maginnis, that fusion of nature and culture is the key. "Our conservation objectives cannot be separated from our own culture and our own philosophy of how we move forward. That's part of the reason why I think China is so successful in having a nature conservation strategy based on coexistence."    Luo saw a still deeper layer. "Seeing the beauty of the water lilies, seeing the process of the wild rice stem from a seed to the root being used by humans, we can feel that we are indeed a community of life," she said. "You might say you are restoring nature, but perhaps it is nature that is healing and restoring you. Humanity and nature are indeed a community of life; it exists in every moment of our daily lives."    New pathways for a warming world    Faced with the triple planetary crisis of climate change, biodiversity loss, and land degradation, Maginnis believes China is no longer just offering a vision — it is handing over a practical toolbox.    He pointed to the restoration of the Loess Plateau and the removal of invasive Spartina from the coastal wetlands of Yancheng in Jiangsu. "One of the very first Nature-based Solutions we identified is the restoration of the Loess Plateau that was highly degraded, and brought back into vibrant biodiversity, vibrant productivity. It's the real coexistence of man and nature."    "I think there are multiple lessons down at the site level, how to do things, but then I think there is more from the governance perspective." The Chinese approach, he said, is not simply about creating isolated protected areas but about "bringing nature right through all of society and all sectors."    On the international stage, he noted that China's leadership in securing the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework is already having ripple effects. In Bangkok, drawing on sponge-city concepts and with advice from China, an old tobacco factory has been turned into an NbS wetland that buffers surrounding districts from floods while doubling as a public park.    Luo added a note of balance. China's NbS pathway, she said, is distinctly institution-driven, and it differs from the market-oriented pathways being explored internationally, such as carbon credits, biodiversity credits, and green finance instruments. "Of course, we should not judge which model is superior. Instead, we should learn from each other and draw on each other's strengths."    As the conversation turned to the future of the planet, Luo's tone grew heavier.    "Six out of nine planetary boundaries for Earth have already been exceeded. Climate tipping points are being breached, and many international agreements are advancing slowly. The future holds tremendous uncertainty."    She paused, but her gaze did not waver. "Yet precisely because of this, we must act. Humanity is part of a community with a shared future. No country can be left behind. And in this grand narrative, every single one of us is a protagonist."    She issued a call that was disarmingly simple: "Start from ourselves. Use one less plastic bag, drive (petrol) one day less, sort your rubbish. These are not slogans; they are the small things in daily life. If everyone does this, our planet will surely become better and better."    A breeze rippled across the Haizhu wetlands, stirring faint reflections of the Canton Tower on the water. In that quiet shimmer, the words of the experts seemed to hang in the air: whatever lies ahead, the green experiments taking root on this patch of land have already opened a window for the world.                    。    2026年8月21日,第五人格IVL夏季赛总决赛第二轮的比赛开始。在当天的比赛中,北京WBG以2胜2平1负(22:20)的比分击败MRC,以下是本场比赛战报。

二 | 第一局比赛上半轮:MRC求生者对阵北京WBG监管者MRC的求生者选择了木偶师、“法罗女士”、弓箭手、“逃脱大师”;北京WBG的监管者N1e选择了“跛脚羊”。(BAN守墓人、飞行家、大副、咒术师)开局“跛脚羊”选择追击“逃脱大师”,并将其击倒送椅。守椅战中,木偶师成功救下“逃脱大师”,下椅的“逃脱大师”最终被击倒淘汰。中期“跛脚羊”将“法罗女士”击倒送椅,木偶师成功救下“法罗女士”,此时求生者将密码机破译完毕。

三 | 开门战中“跛脚羊”将木偶师击倒送椅。

四 | “法罗女士”成功救下木偶师,下椅的木偶师被击倒淘汰,双方完成平局。第一局比赛上半轮双方以2:2的比分打平。第一局比赛下半轮:北京WBG求生者对阵MRC监管者北京WBG的求生者选择了气象学家、幸运儿、古董商、“逃脱大师”;MRC的监管者Sprintzer选择了“女王蜂”。(BAN咒术师、守墓人、“法罗女士”、飞行家)开局“女王蜂”选择追击古董商,古董商牵制一段时间后被击倒送椅。守椅战中幸运儿和“逃脱大师”轮流救下古董商,“女王蜂”击倒古董商后,求生者将密码机破译完毕。

五 | 开门战中“女王蜂”淘汰古董商,并利用闪现击倒气象学家,完成二抓。第一局比赛下半轮双方以2:2的比分打平。第二局比赛上半轮:北京WBG求生者对阵MRC监管者北京WBG的求生者选择了咒术师、“心理学家”、木偶师、守墓人(BAN歌剧演员);MRC的监管者Sprintzer选择了“喧嚣”(BAN佣兵、弓箭手、大副、先知)。开局“喧嚣”选择追击守墓人,并将其击倒送椅。

六 | 守椅战中,木偶师和“心理学家”轮流救下守墓人。当守墓人倒地后,求生者密码机被破译完毕。开门战中守墓人被淘汰,求生者完成三跑。

七 | 第二局比赛上半轮北京WBG以3:1的比分领先。第二局比赛下半轮:MRC求生者对阵北京WBG监管者MRC的求生者选择了病患、玩具商、火灾调查员、大副(BAN“女王蜂”);北京WBG的监管者N1e选择了红蝶。(BAN斗牛士、古董商、空军、“心理学家”)开局红蝶选择追击火灾调查员,并将其快速击倒送椅。守椅战中大副两次救下火灾调查员,下椅的火灾调查员被击倒淘汰。中期红蝶将玩具商击倒送椅,病患成功救下玩具商后被击倒送椅。

八 | 红蝶成功拦截大副救援并将其击倒送椅,随后将玩具商击倒,完成四抓。第二局比赛下半轮北京WBG以5:0的比分领先。

九 | 第三局比赛上半轮:MRC求生者对阵北京WBG监管者MRC的求生者选择了教授、气象学家、古董商、野人(BAN“女王蜂”、“台球手”);北京WBG的监管者N1e选择了杂货商。(BAN幻灯师、空军、“心理学家”、佣兵)开局杂货商选择追击古董商,并将其击倒送椅。守椅战中野人和气象学家轮流救下古董商,下椅的古董商牵制一段时间后,求生者密码机被破译完毕。在开门战中,杂货商将野人击倒。教授成功救下野人,求生者完成三跑。第三局比赛上半轮MRC以3:1的比分领先。第三局比赛下半轮:北京WBG求生者对阵MRC监管者北京WBG的求生者选择了先知、教授、弓箭手、野人(BAN“台球手”、歌剧演员);MRC的监管者Sprintzer选择了杂货商。(BAN幻灯师、“法罗女士”、斗牛士、前锋)开局杂货商选择追击弓箭手,并将其击倒送椅。守椅战中,教授成功救下弓箭手,下椅的弓箭手被再次击倒送椅。杂货商成功拦截野人救援,弓箭手被淘汰。中期教授救下野人,随后野人和教授被依次击倒,野人被送椅。先知成功救下野人,下椅的野人被击倒淘汰,杂货商将先知击倒,随后密码机被破译完毕。在开门战中,先知被击倒送椅,杂货商将教授击倒,密码机破译完毕。第三局比赛下半轮MRC以5:0的比分领先,双方大局战平。第四局比赛上半轮:MRC求生者对阵北京WBG监管者MRC的求生者选择了佣兵、“心理学家”、斗牛士、园丁(BAN“台球手”、“女王蜂”);北京WBG的监管者N1e选择了邦邦。(BAN先知、祭司、幻灯师、飞行家)开局邦邦选择追击园丁,并将其击倒送椅。

十 | 守椅战中佣兵成功救下园丁,下椅的园丁被击倒淘汰。随后邦邦将斗牛士击倒,求生者将密码机破译完毕。

十一 | 开门战中斗牛士被送椅淘汰,监管者完成二抓。第四局比赛上半轮双方以2:2的比分打平。

十二 | 第四局比赛下半轮:北京WBG求生者对阵MRC监管者北京WBG的求生者选择了斗牛士、医生、火灾调查员、佣兵(BAN“台球手”、“跛脚羊”);MRC的监管者Sprintzer选择了蜡像师。(BAN幻灯师、祭司、飞行家、病患)开局蜡像师选择追击斗牛士,并将其击倒送椅。守椅战中佣兵成功救下斗牛士,下椅的斗牛士被击倒淘汰。中期蜡像师将佣兵击倒,随后蜡像师使用传送追击火灾调查员并将其击倒送椅,佣兵成功救下火灾调查员,随后密码机被破译完毕。

十三 | 开门战中佣兵被击倒送椅,医生救下佣兵。随后火灾调查员被击倒送椅,监管者完成二抓。第四局比赛下半轮双方以2:2的比分打平。第五局比赛上半轮:MRC求生者对阵北京WBG监管者MRC的求生者选择了幸运儿、医生、咒术师、前锋(BAN“女王蜂”、歌剧演员);北京WBG的监管者N1e选择了“台球手”。(BAN先知、幻灯师、飞行家、拉拉队员)开局“台球手”选择追击咒术师,并将其击倒送椅。守椅战中医生和幸运儿轮流救下咒术师,下椅的咒术师被击倒淘汰。中期“台球手”将幸运儿击倒送椅,前锋两次成功救下幸运儿,随后求生者密码机被破译完毕。

十四 | 开门战中“台球手”将幸运儿击倒淘汰,随后找到前锋击倒送椅,完成三抓。第五局比赛上半轮北京WBG以3:1的比分领先。第五局比赛下半轮:北京WBG求生者对阵MRC监管者北京WBG的求生者选择了前锋、入殓师、“囚徒”、病患(BAN歌剧演员、“跛脚羊”);MRC的监管者Sprintzer选择了“台球手”。(BAN幻灯师、“法罗女士”、飞行家、空军)开局“台球手”选择追击“囚徒”,并将其快速击倒送椅。守椅战前锋两次成功救下“囚徒”,下椅的“囚徒”被击倒淘汰。中期“台球手”将病患击倒送椅,紧接着求生者将密码机破译完毕。开门战中入殓师成功救下病患,下椅的病患被击倒送椅。前锋成功救下病患,入殓师被击倒送椅,最终完成平局。第五局比赛下半轮双方拿下2:2的比分,北京WBG以小分优势获胜。

十五 | 最终,北京WBG以2胜2平1负(22:20)的比分击败MRC,获得本场比赛的胜利。

十六 |

Current article:http://www.liangkuataosanxuanmiancen.sbs/819n/igf.html

Published on:01:57:53


24小时排行