今日头条

Ex-Illinois child welfare worker guilty of endangerment after boy beaten to death by mom_我的网站

余罪

一 |     WOODSTOCK, Ill. -- A judge convicted a former state child welfare worker Friday of child endangerment in connection with the 2019 beating death of a 5-year-old suburban Chicago boy by his mother, but the judge acquitted the man's supervisor.Lake County Judge George Strickland found Carlos Acosta, 57 of Woodstock, who was a case investigator for the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, guilty of the child endangerment charge but acquitted him of a reckless conduct charge, news outlets reported.Strickland said he could not find Acosta’s supervisor, Andrew Polovin, 51, of Island Lake, guilty of either charge because he did not know how much Polovin knew about the abuse of the boy, Andrew “AJ” Freund of Crystal Lake.AJ died in April 2019 after being beaten by his mother. JoAnn Cunningham. She is serving a 35-year sentence for his murder.The boy’s father, Andrew Freund Sr., was sentenced to 30 years in prison for covering up the murder by burying the boy’s body in a field.Acosta and Polovin were accused of ignoring numerous warning signs of the boy’s abuse.Polovin’s attorney, Matthew McQuaid, said he and his client were “grateful” for the verdict.“I never thought he committed a crime,” McQuaid said.He said Polovin, who was fired by the state, now works in a different field.Authorities said Cunningham killed AJ on April 15, 2019, after she became angry about soiled underwear that he had tried to hide. She forced the boy to stand in a cold shower for at least 20 minutes, hit him in the head with the shower head, and then put him to bed cold, wet and naked, authorities said.AJ’s body was found wrapped in plastic in a shallow grave near the family’s home in Crystal Lake.。    

【环球网科技综合报道】9月14日消息,据第三方机构信息显示,近日,上海幻电信息科技有限公司与国家知识产权局相关案件一审文书公开。文书显示,上海幻电信息科技有限公司曾对某食品公司申请注册的的方便食品类“哔哩哔哩BILIBILI”商标申请无效宣告。国家知识产权局裁定认为,幻电公司请求认定引证商标为公众所熟知的商标的理由缺乏事实依据,裁定诉争商标予以维持。幻电公司提起政诉讼,请求法院撤销被诉裁定,并判令被告重新作出裁定。法院审理认为,幻电公司向国家知识产权局提交的基本信息等,与判断引证商标是否构成驰名商标并无关联;且证明B站及其手机客户端的知名度、宣传情况及推广情况,不足以证明引证商标在其核定使用的培训等服务上具有了较高的知名度;同时,幻电公司向国家知识产权局提交的B站内部“入站必刷”视频、播放量最高博主截图、B站运营游戏情况等,不足以证明引证商标在其核定使用的服务上构成驰名商标。最终,法院裁定驳回原告上海幻电信息科技有限公司的诉讼请求。

Current article:http://www.liangkuataosanxuanmiancen.sbs/list_jnr/q3dgi.html

Published on:00:22:04


我的网站最近更新

我的网站热门资讯